Understanding the Military Ethos
Momin Iftikhar
11/27/2012

 

Let us take a pause and examine the two fundamental questions; one, are we promoting the rule of law and the constitution? Two, are we strengthening or weakening the institutions?
Excerpt from General Kayani’s statement.

General Kayani has a reputation for core professionalism, imperturbability and for being a soldier with few words. He has the unique honor of leading the Pak Army in most unusual and perilous circumstances that have engulfed the Nation following the arrival of the US and NATO Forces in our Western neighborhood. The forces of terrorism and obscurantism are challenging the existence of moderate polity and threatening the internal security of our Nation in an unprecedented manner. At this critical juncture of our history the Armed Forces of Pakistan stand as the final bulwark against rapidly worsening internal and external threats. The leadership and the rank and file of Pakistan Army are stretched to the maximum in matching up to the extraordinary challenge; making unprecedented sacrifices. Pakistan Army has already suffered over five thousand casualties in the War on Terror and there will inevitably be more before we ultimately prevail – Insha Allah. The fatalities absorbed surpass by at least twice the combined total of the shahadats offered in all previous conflicts with India. The circumstances are challenging and the General has an unimpeachable loyalty to his command to speak out on their behalf. As he took to the rostrum before a gathering of officers in GHQ and made an assessment of the prevailing state of affairs having a bearing on Army’s operational functionality, his words carried much weight , sagacity and wisdom.
It reflected an articulate and objective reading of the Army’s pulse, sought institutional synthesis within the corridors of power, succinctly indicated to the stress factors injurious to morale and bonds of trust among ranks and file and pointed to a relentless institutional slandering campaign, waged by design or default, which sought to blame the entire institution for actions of a few retired senior officers without due consideration to the facts on ground. It was manifest that the General was concerned by the manner in which Army was being targeted by unfounded rumors and propaganda and attempts were being made to sully the image of higher echelon of Army leadership. “Equally important is the trust between the leaders and the led in the armed forces. Any effort to create a distinction between the two undermines the very basis of the concept and is not tolerated,” asserted General Kayani. When he said that obviously at the back of his mind was the slew of cases involving some retired senior officers which appeared before superior court in rapid succession and flagged off an unsavory anti army campaign by vested quarters. In the backdrop of wilting law and order situation in Baluchistan the, calling to court of military commanders to account for the scourge of missing persons in Baluchistan, where a foreign sponsored insurgency is in the process of forming itself into a full blown phenomenon, might also have rankled the mind of the Army Chief.
Despite the speech’s objectivity and balanced tone and tenor it was amazing to note the manner in which some ‘anchors’ tried to seize upon the communication in all negativity without digesting the contents and manifestly without due deliberation. Obviously, these individuals failed to recognize that the officers, all the way from bottom to the pinnacle of the command pyramid claim the loyalty and following of their juniors by unflinchingly displaying an unimpeachable standard of personal honor and integrity. Centuries of military traditions have established beyond doubt that only those can lead and claim the trust of their subordinates who are beyond reproach and above any suspicion of moral turpitude. The relish with which certain elements of print and electronic media lapped up few incidents of financial mismanagement involving retired Army officers when serving in civil sector, to roil the Army as an institution and degrade its senior leadership is only lamentable. The General is obviously, and rightly, anguished over this uncalled for and vested mudslinging. The insidious effects of such a free for all campaign to smear the Army top brass are either not understood by those waging it or certain vested quarters are using the unrestrained liberty of media in Pakistan to ‘tear the pea patch’ in line with their subversive agenda.
By Allah’s grace Pakistan Army, over the years, has consolidated its position as a sterling institution earning the trust and confidence of people and turning into a true asset for the Nation. It has delivered , time and again whenever called upon to rally and reach out , irrespective of the staggering odds needed to be overcome in order to prevail. In the current context the challenges have, perhaps, never been greater. FATA has turned into a terror hub , projecting its searing fingers into the hinterland and combined with the responsibility for keeping vigil on the Eastern and Western Borders; particularly the latter where renegade terrorists of Fazalullah’s ilk as well as the trigger happy US and ISAF troops have to be kept at bay, the task is truly Herculean. Army has to absorb in stoic silence and with a stiff upper lip the painful cost of inevitable casualties that is the price for responding to the call of duty in service of Pakistan in complex internal and foreign environment comparable to a witches’ brew. Maintenance of high morale and keeping up the chin by the Army holds the ultimate key in defeating the threatening scenario and ride out the storm; only our enemies will want it otherwise.
Unflinching loyalty and solidarity; one for all and all for one - forms the bedrock of Pakistan Army’s ethos. This unshakeable bond of trust and respect shapes the existence of strong bonds of discipline , loyalty and respect between officers and men that lends strength to the institution and is a true force multiplier. When a trumped up concerted drive seeking to soil the integrity of the serving senior commanders of the Pakistan Army, spuriously based upon yet to be proved charges of financial mismanagement against a few retired senior officers while serving in civilian institutions under unexplained circumstances, becomes rampant, some thing is gravely wrong . In Army’s ethos personal integrity and a sterling character provide the moral authority for command and in the flush of asserting authority all pillars of state should take care not to unnecessarily dent the vital bonds that have sustained Pak Army as a cohesive, reliable and effective institution at service of the Nation.